MW 1988: Pontiac Fiero Formula vs Toyota MR2 Supercharged Comparison Road Test


Air Date February 20, 1988 MW 1988: Pontiac Fiero Formula vs Toyota MR2 Supercharged Comparison Road Test

This entry was posted in Toyota and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

25 Comments

  1. mmdaniels33
    Posted June 2, 2010 at 11:23 pm | Permalink

    @westworth327 You dont want wheel spin on your launch! lol but good try mr biased. They had around the same times because the fiero is a v6 and prob has way better top end.

  2. westworth327
    Posted June 2, 2010 at 11:55 pm | Permalink

    Wow. I dont think that guy launched as hard in the Fiero as the MR2. The tires spun at launch in the TOY and not in the Fiero! I know they would spin on launch cause I own a Fiero, 86 L44-M17. Somehow the 1/4 mile times are about the same although they had a faster 0-60 in the TOY. V6 BABY!!

  3. Jasonm1976
    Posted June 2, 2010 at 11:57 pm | Permalink

    I used to have an 1988 fiero back in 1997. I bought it at a deal for 1,500 cash, drove it for 2 years and a guy hit me and totaled it and i received a check for $2,700. I loved that car. it drove nice.

  4. Jasonm1976
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 12:50 am | Permalink

    I used to have an 1988 fiero back in 1997. I bought it at a deal for 1,500 cash, drove it for 2 years and a guy hit me and totaled it and i received a check for $2,700. I loved that car. it drove nice.

  5. roytboga
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 1:22 am | Permalink

    This is when Detriot was fighting back. Made for good cars.

  6. playhouserage
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 1:59 am | Permalink

    Lets not put fingerprints on the mr2 please. Use gloves

  7. Seattlecarnut
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 2:46 am | Permalink

    I’ll have to visit there one day. I enjoy watching the car road tests from Motor Week, Car and Driver and, whenever possible, Motor Trend.

  8. bajabusta
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 3:16 am | Permalink

    @Seattlecarnut cool, yeah I live right above city call, where they are putting in the new overpass

  9. Seattlecarnut
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 3:34 am | Permalink

    I’m afraid I missed the Renton part at first. I’m sorry. I drive through Renton alot when I take I405 to Gig Harbor, where I live on weekends.

  10. bajabusta
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 3:39 am | Permalink

    @Seattlecarnut um, see comment below! I am in Renton now!! I used to work in the red brick building to the left on kirkland way just south of 405 as you go west down 85th under the freeway!! LOL

  11. Seattlecarnut
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 4:16 am | Permalink

    Where do you live now, bajabusta? I live in Kirkland’s Rose Hill area.

  12. bajabusta
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 4:42 am | Permalink

    @Autoxdriver agreed. many people only talk about zero to sixty and quarter mile. There are tons of variables and other performance aspects that contribute to an overall package. Great point Autoxdriver.

  13. Autoxdriver
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 5:03 am | Permalink

    They said the MR2 was faster on the racetrack but the Fiero would have beaten the MR2 in a race longer than a couple of laps. They admitted that the MR2′s brakes sucked and faded fast. That is a huge disadvantage on a race track. Braking performance is just as important as acceleration on a road course.

  14. akvalues
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 5:28 am | Permalink

    MR2 is nice.

  15. Turbosaunderground
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 5:39 am | Permalink

    The best: mid engines cars.

  16. Seattlecarnut
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 6:03 am | Permalink

    Motor Week has always been one of my favourite tv car shows.

  17. Seattlecarnut
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 6:55 am | Permalink

    I’m not familiar with Finn Hill.

  18. bajabusta
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 7:14 am | Permalink

    @Seattlecarnut oh wow, I grew up on finn hill, and in Kingsgate. I moved to renton few years ago, could afford more home down here, but I still work in kirkland, totem lake!!

  19. Seattlecarnut
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 7:16 am | Permalink

    I live in Kirkland. I was born on Capital Hill, in Seattle.

  20. bajabusta
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 7:19 am | Permalink

    @Seattlecarnut what part of Seattle are you in? I am in Renton.

  21. Seattlecarnut
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 7:26 am | Permalink

    I love the styling of both cars. I’d go for the V6 engine for the Fiero. While I like the acceleration of the supercharged MR2, the Fiero isn’t that far behind. I like the interior look. I used to own an MR2, not as nice looking as this one, but not bad, but I found it easier to get in, than get comfortable once I’m in. It’s too bad that Pontiac is no longer. The Fiero, for its short production run provided some much needed excitement for the division.

  22. Allante715
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 8:26 am | Permalink

    Old MR2s simply rusted away. That is why you don`t see them.

  23. ghost187x
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 8:49 am | Permalink

    @tag1337ninja rofl

  24. 777Shock777
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 9:45 am | Permalink

    I would take the fiero, but I wouldnt mind an MR2 either. win win situation

  25. lsvtecb18c1
    Posted June 3, 2010 at 10:38 am | Permalink

    i would bang the bitch at 10:39 i don’t care what anyone says, shes hot for an older 80′s chic for real.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>